This week, King County Sheriff Mitzi G. Johanknecht released a statement, expressing her concerns over the “lack of transparency from the County Council.”
Johanknecht’s concerns likely arose after the King County Council discussed an ordinance they’re considering for the Nov. 3 ballot that would change the Sheriff from an elected official to one selected by the council.
Under this measure, 9 members of the county council, along with the County Executive, would control the separately elected Sheriff.
The King County Sheriff’s Office contracts with the City of SeaTac for its police services.
“I am deeply concerned that King County voters have not been given ample opportunity to be heard on Proposed Ordinance 2020-0231, which seeks an amendment to the County charter that attempts to circumvent state law (RCW Chapter 36.28) by narrowing the Sheriff’s authority to whatever role the Council assigns, rather than the broad scope of authority provided by our legislature,” Johanknecht said.
Here’s the full text of her statement:
“The democratic process should be a transparent process, one where elected officials seek the community’s input and participation before taking action. I am deeply concerned that King County voters have not been given ample opportunity to be heard on Proposed Ordinance 2020-0231, which seeks an amendment to the County charter that attempts to circumvent state law (RCW Chapter 36.28) by narrowing the Sheriff’s authority to whatever role the Council assigns, rather than the broad scope of authority provided by our legislature.
“Under this measure, 9 members of the county council, and the County Executive, would control the separately elected Sheriff. The Executive already controls our human resources, hiring processes and bargaining with labor groups. The Executive and Council control the King County Sheriff’s Office budget, and can use provisos to effect accountability and change.
“We believe voters want a fully independent Sheriff, who is free to take bold action on reforms and represent all of the communities and interests of our diverse constituency.
“In 2017, I ran on a platform of reform and have since made significant changes to Sheriff’s Office policies and training. Despite community calls for continued reform and reinvention of the role of law enforcement in our community, I have not received any reform proposals from the members of the County Council who are attempting to rush these matters to the ballot under the guise of reform. Only Council members Lambert, Dunn and von Reichbauer have engaged in meaningful conversation with me to bring about the changes our community members would like to see (view PDF of letter to Councilmember Joe McDermott).
“The Council’s lack of transparency about Proposed Ordinance 2020-0231 should be compared to Proposed Ordinance 2020-0205, which seeks to amend the County charter and revert to an appointed Sheriff. This measure was studied and vetted for over a year by the Charter Review Commission, and was the subject of multiple public hearings at various times of the day so all voices could be heard. Critical questions should be asked about why Council is not affording the public the same opportunity with Ordinance 2020-0231.”
– Sheriff Mitzi G. Johanknecht
Funny, I’m concerned that the King County Sheriff has ceased providing data to SpotCrime since Dec 2019. So it seems her concerns over transparency are… selective.
Mr. Mills,
King County Sheriff has NEVER provided data to SpotCrime. They do feed a different website called CrimeReports.com. I don’t know anything about SpotCrime, but maybe they got tired of cutting and pasting from other websites. You might ask them.