Port of Seattle Commission President Fred Felleman on Monday, July 19, 2021 released a statement in response to public concerns about the Port’s controversial proposal to construct an employee parking lot in North SeaTac Park.
As we previously reported, the Port is proposing turning an estimated 11 acres of mature forest in North SeaTac Park into a 1,500-space employee parking lot #L06. The plan – part of the organization’s Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) – has inspired an online petition against it.
“The Port Commission will not take action on this or any other SAMP-related projects, until after the environmental review which includes receiving feedback from the public,” Felleman said. “We will then apply our values when selecting which projects will receive funding. The Port Commission continues to take other actions to reduce single-occupancy trips to the airport and protect trees while providing economic opportunities for airport communities.”
The Port says that over 30 different projects, including alternatives, are all currently undergoing environmental review by the Port and FAA.
“The purpose of the environmental review is to fully evaluate potential environmental impacts and to determine if they can be adequately mitigated or to identify alternatives that are less impactful,” the Port said. “The Port and FAA expect to publish the draft environmental assessment by the end of the year.”
Here’s Felleman’s full statement:
“The Port Commission appreciates the community’s interest and concerns over a staff proposal to potentially construct an employee parking lot on a portion of North SeaTac Park the Port leases to the City of SeaTac. We want to assure community members that Port Commissioners regard the protection of the environment and quality of life as being among our fundamental responsibilities. We understand that open space is especially important to residents near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
“With regard to the employee parking lot proposal, Commissioners are concerned about impacts that could be caused through the loss of park land and impacts from single-occupancy vehicles coming to the airport.
“This proposal is but one alternative being reviewed as to how to meet potential future employee parking needs as part of the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Port staff began the development of the SAMP in 2013 to prepare for future growth at the airport. It contains a set of proposed projects, none of which are approved.
“Over 30 different projects, including alternatives, are all currently undergoing environmental review by the Port and FAA. The purpose of the environmental review is to fully evaluate potential environmental impacts and to determine if they can be adequately mitigated or to identify alternatives that are less impactful. The Port and FAA expect to publish the draft environmental assessment by the end of the year.
“The Port Commission will not take action on this or any other SAMP-related projects, until after the environmental review which includes receiving feedback from the public. We will then apply our values when selecting which projects will receive funding. The Port Commission continues to take other actions to reduce single-occupancy trips to the airport and protect trees while providing economic opportunities for airport communities.
“We appreciate knowing how much the community values North SeaTac Park. Commissioners will decide the merits of the alternative ways to meet potential future needs for employee parking after the environmental review and public comment period. We appreciate those of you who already provided comments on the scoping document in 2018 and encourage you to submit any additional feedback for our consideration during the next comment period following the publication of the draft environmental review.
“Once again, thank you for sharing your concerns, and know that we hear you.”
Fred Felleman, President
Port of Seattle Commission President
between the Port and Sound Transit’s Federal Way extension, the neighborhood of Pacific Ridge has had nearly all tree canopy and other vegetation removed.
I see all the talk about environmental review; I don’t know how these reviews are but I do know that the port primarily has left this neighborhood – one which is the densest in population, has a high amount of Black and Brown residents, has a poverty rate of 32%, and is served by underperforming schools – to basically marinate in jet fuel, exhaust from I-5 and Pac Highway, and soon exhaust from the 509 extension.
the forested area where the new FAA building is was desperately needed to mitigate pollution from the airport and the surrounding freeway and highway for this neighborhood. to have so much removed should be criminal, tbh, and now y’all want to take more?
do you realize that a child living in poverty is already significantly impacted academically, then add living in an area with hardly any vegetation and surrounded by big pollution sources. why does that matter? because research has shown that children who live in areas with little vegetation are much more frequently experiencing troubles with concentration etc when compared to children living with lots of vegetation around.
your decision to basically clear cut almost all of the vegetation in and near the Pacific Ridge neighborhood is an active environmental Injustice and your legacies will live on in the struggles with concentration and other brain development impacts that the children of that neighborhood will face because of your decisions.
I just frankly find it completely disgusting that institutions, organizations and governments can get away with basically sh*#ting all over poor folks, especially poor Brown and Black residents, and forcing them to live with hugely disproportionate environmental burdens.
do better, please.
Please leave this park alone. This park is used and loved every day for decades! Find another place with cement and maybe a vacant building. Quit chopping trees and putting in asphalt and cement. Kids and family enjoy the parks and everyday there is less and less